The railroad industry moves goods with powerful diesel locomotives and supports that movement with rail yards, sidings, track maintenance, and treated railroad ties.
These activities release diesel emissions and, in some places, leave behind hazardous substances from historic operations.
Multiple research lines (cancer classifications, health-risk assessments around yards, near-source air-pollution science, and coal-train studies) support a credible concern for communities near rail operations, especially where trains idle, train cars pass frequently, or large rail yards sit close to homes.
What is the Difference Between Occupational Exposure and Community Exposure?
Occupational exposure (railroad employees) typically experience higher-dose, longer-hour workplace exposures to diesel fuel exhaust, solvents, benzene, creosote, and other dangerous chemicals during operations, shop work, or track maintenance.
These are well documented in worker studies and underpin the consensus that chronic, high-intensity diesel exposure raises lung cancer risk.
Community exposure (nearby residents), on the other hand, typically experience lower-dose but prolonged exposure to the same pollutants when homes border busy lines or large yards, especially downwind.
While residents are not as intensely or as frequently exposed as workers, long-term proximity can still increase cumulative exposure to carcinogens like diesel particulate matter and benzene.
Scientific Studies and Assessments Relevant to Residents Nearby Rail Operations
Living near tracks doesn’t automatically mean cancer, but where railroad industry activity is heavy (big yards, frequent diesel traffic, uncovered dusty cargoes), prolonged exposure to carcinogenic pollutants can be higher than in other neighborhoods.
If your home sits very close to a busy corridor or yard, especially downwind, it’s reasonable to ask about local monitoring, support near-home exposure reduction, and push for rail-side measures that reduce emissions at the source.
Relevant studies and assessments include:
- IARC classification of diesel exhaust (WHO): Diesel engine exhaust is carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), with sufficient evidence for lung cancer. This is the core scientific foundation: when diesel emissions are consistently elevated near homes, cancer risk plausibly rises. (IARC Press Release No. 213, 2012).
- California rail-yard health-risk assessments (CARB): Multiple assessments (e.g., Roseville, City of Industry, Colton, Long Beach intermodal) modeled diesel particulate from locomotives and yard equipment and found elevated lifetime cancer risk for neighborhoods closest to large yards, with risk declining over distance (often beyond ~1 mile).
- EPA “near-road” science (applicable by analogy to train corridors): EPA summarizes higher concentrations of traffic-related pollutants within ~300–500 meters of major corridors and associates proximity with increased risks including childhood leukemia signals in some studies—mechanisms (fine particles, PAHs, benzene) overlap with rail emissions.
- Coal-train particulate studies (California): Peer-reviewed analyses and university summaries show PM2.5 increases from uncovered coal trains with modeled health burdens for nearby populations, supporting the idea that what travels in train cars can affect communities along the line.
- Benzene (IARC Volume 120 & ACS): Benzene, present in combustion emissions and some yard activities, is a Group 1 carcinogen linked to leukemia; it provides a mechanistic bridge between rail-adjacent air pollution and blood-cancer concerns raised in traffic-exposure literature.
- Legacy contamination case (Houston, TX): A former creosote wood-preserving site at a rail company yard left soil and groundwater contamination; public health agencies identified cancer clusters nearby, and the city funded relocations, illustrating that historic materials used on railroad ties can create site-specific cancer risks distinct from air exposure.
What This Means for People Living Near Railroad Tracks
For people who live near railroad tracks, the level of cancer risk depends heavily on the type and intensity of rail activity in the area.
A quiet line with only a few passenger trains passing each day does not create the same exposure as a freight corridor where heavy diesel locomotives run at all hours or where idling is common at nearby yards.
Studies from the California Air Resources Board consistently show that neighborhoods closest to large rail yards experience the highest modeled cancer risks, with those risks dropping as distance from the yard increases.
Factors such as train frequency, the use of diesel locomotives, the presence of uncovered or dusty train cars, and even local wind patterns and geography can all influence how much pollution reaches nearby homes.
The pollutants of greatest concern include diesel particulate matter, elemental carbon, nitrogen oxides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and certain metals that result from fuel combustion and rail wear.
In some locations, benzene from diesel fuel and creosote chemicals from historic railroad ties have added to the mix of hazardous substances in surrounding communities.
Because these compounds are recognized as dangerous chemicals linked to cancer and other diseases, prolonged exposure (even at lower doses than those faced by railroad employees) can still create meaningful health risks for civilians who live close to rail operations.
While not every household near a track is frequently exposed at harmful levels, people in communities near rail operations have legitimate reasons to be concerned about their long-term health.